People's Waterfront Coalition

From More Perfect

Pwc_sponsorbanner.jpg

If the Viaduct didn't exist, would we build it today?

The opportunity is unprecedented. The Alaskan Way Viaduct was damaged and must come down, freeing up public land on Seattle's downtown shore. This demands a holistic approach to the future of this land, where moving vehicles is only one of a host of concerns. How could Seattle rebuild a freeway along its shore without exploring the greater possibilities?

A Better Solution for the Alaskan Way Viaduct: Transit + Streets

There are now many national examples of cities removing highways, dispersing the traffic, and reclaiming the land for better uses -- and not one has ever wished to have the highway back.

Researchers have studied over 100 cases of highway removal or downsizing in various cities, and found that redistributing traffic onto other facilities and modes works -- if well planned and managed. Not one of these cities experienced the traffic chaos predicted by naysayers. They concluded “predictions of traffic problems are often unnecessarily alarmist, and that, given appropriate local circumstances, significant reductions in overall traffic levels can occur, with people making a far wider range of behavioral responses than has traditionally been assumed.”

Let's target our collective brainpower toward this challenge: how can Seattle provide mobility at a reasonable cost while reaping the broadest public benefit? Let's constructively approach the mobility challenge with the full set of tools available: better connectivity in the street grid, better transit, a new local urban street, better traffic management, denser (more walkable) neighborhoods, etc..

Earthquakes and the Embarcadero: The San Francisco Solution

image:pwc_embarcadero.jpg
In San Francisco a majority of citizens believed they couldn’t live without the Embarcadero freeway. (They voted No -- twice -- on removing it.) When the 1989 earthquake took it out, they found out otherwise.

City leaders decided to not rebuild, but to use the opportunity to regenerate a healthy neighborhood on the water. And what about the traffic that was previously carried by the freeway? The people of San Francisco adapted, using a variety of other solutions, including surface streets and transit; there was no noticeable increase in congestion. Meanwhile, development in this area blossomed, and San Francisco reclaimed a valuable asset to the City.

What About the Tunnel?

While the People's Waterfront Coalistion shares the Mayor's vision to recapture the waterfront, the proposed tunnel is not what Seattleites are imagining. This highway will only be partially lidded; it’s actually an aerial highway (or possibly an unlidded trench) from Pine Street to Battery Street and a wide surface highway south of King Street. Traffic will not disappear from sight, and in some areas the new highway will be a much worse barrier to the water than the Viaduct. Only drivers bypassing downtown are expected to use it, since there are no exits into the core of our city. A decade of construction will decimate the 1200 businesses along this corridor. With only 5% of the funding from the feds, elected officials are raising local and state taxes to pay for the multi-billion project. It is a huge, complex, expensive project for a very limited user base.

Transit + Streets

image:Pwc_viaduct.jpg
The People’s Waterfront Coalition advocates removing the 2-mile long Viaduct and not replacing it with another highway. Instead we propose Transit + Streets: a multimodal, system-wide solution where existing streets, transit, and I-5 are improved to provide mobility for the future. The total cost of these measures, including the costs to remove the viaduct and repair the seawall, is an estimated $1.6 billion.

Other Links

About People's Waterfront Coalition

The People's Waterfront Coalition is a coalition of concerned citizens, planners and urban designers united in the belief that Seattle's downtown waterfront is too important, too rich in potential, to be used as a highway for another 100 years. We want to save Seattle taxpayers billions by avoiding megaproject construction. Inject new, year-round economic vitality into a stagnant tourist zone. Catalyze a more residential downtown by creating a generous waterfront park. Refresh rather than injure Elliott Bay's delicate marine ecology. Invest in mass transit and a better connected street-grid to benefit all Seattleites. Create a place for future generations where the urban and natural worlds mix, and in which our city's character is enriched by that confluence: a real place for everyone, not just automobiles.

Contact Information

web: http://www.peopleswaterfront.org
email: heyyou@peopleswaterfront.org

P.O. Box 2332
Seattle, WA 98111
206-624-1061

Additional Resources

Interested in more information and evidence from other cities? Check out these resources:

Local news on the viaduct decision

San Francisco’s successes

Real world evidence: malleable demand

PWC Web Site Links

Imagine Seattle's Waterfront in a Post-Viaduct Future


Views
jump to your state